Use Of Torture As A Counter Terrorism Tool Criminology Essay

Use Of anguish As A Counter Terrorism nib Criminology EssayTorture refers to subjecting intense pain and scummy to a psyche leading to mental and physical pain so as to contract certain in micturateation that the mortal is concealing. T presentfore, Levinson (p.32) concurs with most scholars that twinge is the intentional annoyance of pain and suffering to persons normally for a certain purpose. Torture is primarily apply as a scratch by the join States and early(a) countries to cause a breakdown in the personality of suspects so that they be sub collectabled to admit certain info. The most common methods employed during wo(e) include, severe beating, sexual assault, suffocation and electric shock among former(a) methods.Krauthammer in his article states that it was the Bush giving medication that led to the birth of distress in the United States landscape. According to Krauthammer, no one, not even the executive s allowed to use crucify as a bill to obtain inform ation. He further insinuates that the information is nor normally worth the crucify. Security agencies should go substantiate to the drawing board and adapt to forensic science techniques. in that location is want for the legal philosophy and other gage agencies to be empowered by dint of knowledge them on how to obtain information. The UN Convention and Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions foreclose wo(e) (Kinsley, p.1).There crap been questions as to whether torture should be ban as a means of compelling persons to give certain information. Torture has had severe consequences that are far reaching from the pain that the victims feel. While we accept that terrorist act is a major headache worldwide, it is imperative to consider that zip is guilty until proven innocent.Moreover, the human beings Rights law is strongly against torture as a tool used to coerce suspects to volunteer certain information. Human Rights watchdogs are forever against any pain and suffering inflicted intentionally. The United States has always found itself on the receiving end with much(prenominal) draconian laws that have perpetrate its image on the spot light. Many people who hear to the highest degree the torture stories of the survivors or victims often hold a grudge against the political sympathies. This is due to the intentional pain and suffering that the suspect is made to undergo.There is an arrogance that torture save millions of lives. The major question that makes torture to be at stake is the 50-50 chance. Normally, those who torture suspects assume that they have bouncy information. What if they do not? The suspects would have already suffered innocently. Krauthammer has put forth certain rules that need to be followed by the United States government. Proponents of torture fear that if the United State government follows these rules to the letter, then it might find itself not torturing anybody at all.We should greet the fact that we are already l iving with the terrorism problem and are doing nothing on a personal level to reduce terrorism. Do we need the tool of torture to reduce terrorism? The answer here is a loud, NO. Indeed, we do not need any form of torture to reduce terrorism. We can be community police who leave behind be watching our environment on a daily foundation to avert terrorism.However, torture should be used as a counter-terrorism tool whenever in that location is inside information leaked from terror cells regarding an impending terror attack. In this case, torture would enable the suspects who have been nabbed to volunteer certain vital information that may save more lives. In this case, torture is positive as it leads to saving more lives.Therefore, in this case, torture is warranted as a tool to ensure that information is given out by the suspects. Such separate information is normally timely to enable the security agencies to act luxuriant towards prevent potential terrorist attacks. The problem comes in when the person being anguish is an innocent person. Most of the times the security forces that inflict torture usually have a fifty-fifty chance that the person being rack is the actual suspect.In my opinion, torture should not be used as a counter-terrorism tool since it does not acts for the best interest of the general commonplace that live under the constant mercy of terrorists. However, I strongly efflorescence that the use of torture should be regulated by the international laws. The economy of torture is key towards ensuring that as much as it is used as a tool, it remains under control so that the suspects are not killed as a result of the infliction of pain and intense suffering.It should be further noted that during the torture process, vital information is normally obtained that is nitty-gritty to fighting terrorism, though with a 50-50 chance of obtaining such information (Kinsley, p.33). Therefore, torture aids in obtaining such information. Critics insi nuate that torture has been successfully used as a counter-terrorism tool since it has enabled the police and security agencies to make the suspects to give very important information. As such, torture is worth the task of obtaining such vital information.In addition, the United Nations Convention against Torture prohibits the use of torture as a tool in the fight against terrorism. Torture has been condemned in many states due to the adverse effects that it usually has on its victims. The United States does not championship torture at least in theory. There have been various reports and even documentary pointing to the Guantanamo bay prison where it is assert that prisoners are torture and even killed. The latest reports indicate that terrorism suspects are usually kept in this prison facility where they are tortured to the end.Research indicates that the information obtained during the process of torture is normally worth the stainless process. Most of this information is used by the law enforcement agencies as hearty as security agencies to form solid evidence and develop on a case. It may also be serviceable in averting further deaths and property damage in case of a intend or botched terrorism attack.Andrew Sullivan is a strong advocate against torture and describes torture as the exact opposite of freedom. He further states that it is the defense reaction of freedom from humanity and the taking away of selfhood. Andrew Sullivan is therefore against the use of torture as a counter-terrorism tool. Torture has indeed been the tool that most of the security investigation teams use on victims despite the negative image that the punishment comes with.Torture creates a negative picture or image of the police and investigating teams. Hence, this raises the question as to whether the information is worth obtaining in the panache that it is obtained via the use of torture.At times, torture is subjected to the wrong victims or suspects. It is for this reas on that I advocate for the government to regulate the use of torture. In my ardent opinion, torture should only be used after investigations are complete and that they point towards a particular person. Otherwise, it would be unfair to subject an innocent person to torture when in fact they know nothing about terrorism. probe teams have to be succinct in their work to avoid the occurrence of this kind of errors otherwise, it would amount to massive infringement of human proper(a)s.On the other hand, Krauthammer supports torture as a tool that assists the investigating teams to obtain useful information that indeed help them to unravel certain cases of terrorism. It is obvious that terrorism is not morally right. However, where saving many lives is concerned, torture would indeed be the ultimate solution. Terrorism has been a global problem and continues to be a problem in the wake of several terrorist cells.RecommendationsThe government should consider victimization other forms of punishments or methods that would coerce suspects to give certain useful information. However, this again poses a problem as to whether the terrorist suspects will volunteer information. Most of the terrorists usually take an oath that can only be broken through the use of torture.Personality breakdown has been proven to work just right for them. According to Krauthammer (p.2), the United Nations Convention should consider monitoring the submission and administration of torture as a tool that is effective for obtaining information from terrorist suspects. This should be carried out according to the laid out plans.ConclusionThe pain and suffering caused by torture are often extreme and traumatizing. In fact, there is possibility that the suspect being tortured does not have the vital information required to fight terrorism and save millions of lives. Torture obviously goes against human rights and infringes on individual rights. It has often been suggested that the torture victims usually have rights just like the other people. Human Rights Watch has been stern in discouraging this form of punishment. I therefore do not support torture.