Hypnotherapy Essay -- Health, Smoking Cessation

Hypnotherapy is widely recognised, as a system for aiding skunk cessation, however, conflicting evidence exists regarding its efficacy. In meta analysis hypnosis proved 3 times to a greater extent effective than nicotine replacement methods, and 15 times more effective than stopping without help (Schmidt and Chockalingham, 1992). Having said this, results are not forever and a day clean cut. A number of studies report a mixture of triumph rates i.e. 90.6% (Barber, 2001), 90% (Klager, 2004), and 80% (Crasilneck, 1990), while others report much dishonor rates of success at 48% (Elkins and Rajab, 2004) and 25% (Ahijevych, Yerardi and Nedilsky, 2000). Something else to consider is the mutation of methods that whitethorn be adopted in order to treat smoking cessation with hypnosis, as the efficacy of these methods may also vary (Crasilneck, 1990 Barber, 2001 Spiegel, Frischholz, Fleiss and Spiegel, 1993). However, the ceaseless variable within smoking cessation treatment is the pa tient. wherefore, treatment clean-cut towards the individual needs of the smoker needs to be considered when evaluating the best uprise to therapy.This is a non-clinical case study exploring whether multi session trim treatment may better serve the individual needs of certain smokers. Therefore, hypnotherapeutic techniques are tailored to the patients needs in order to achieve optimal success. The patient (D) is a male actor. He lives with his partner who has recently stop smoking with hypnosis. He is 31 yrs old and has been smoking for 18yrs. This is Ds third approach at smoking cessation. Initially D seek to stop smoking without help and was unsuccessful. Ds second attempt involved single session smoking cessation, and failed to achieve lasting results. Therefore a multi ses... ...to practice relaxation techniques autonomously over a three-day period forwards his second session of hypnosis. D had showed Case Study, London.prolonged abstinence in the past and is living wi th a significant other (who has now halt smoking) therefore, it would seem probable that low level of hypnotisability may have been master(a) in impeding his progress, initially. Research suggests that high hypnotisability facilitates successful behaviour passing (Frischolz et al, 1993). Therefore, in Ds case, this needed to be addressed before further therapy could commence. However, it has been suggested that abstinence from smoking does not correlate with hypnotisability (Holroyd, 1991). Nevertheless, it could be argued that within this study, low rate of abstinence i.e. 16% may have prevent verification of a relationship between hypnotisability and outcome.