Essay on Liberty and Society

The good society. In a good society, an individual fire experience both exemption and arbitrator. provided these ideas, openhandeddom and rightness, atomic number 18 lifelessness debat adapted. Could these ideas actu ally exist with each other? The globe of both dischargedom and justice are both limited by m either factors. exemption is to be able to exercise your desires, to freely express your feelings, you expressions, and to be able to live your life in a mode that you enjoy it.The limitation though, is when your freedom overlaps other passels freedom, whether negatively or positively. homogeneous freedom of expression, when you do so it affects other bulk, like their freedom to take aim a religion past there is injustice there. That is where the concept of justice enters.Justice is there to correct communitys mistakes, so that they would non further step on other messs freedom. It is not punish ment, but it could be a means to punish. Justice is the idea t hat sets guidelines to is freedom. It is there to tie sure that you remain fair and respect law and found. This is all for the good of all, not besides for your self, but of the community. various views. Henry George and John Stuart Mill are both brilliant people with different views of society and how people should live. They affirm almost inverse, opposing ideas near the way people should go about their lives and their communities.Majority Rules. For Mill, it is the legal age that rules, wherein they are the ones who impose a law on questions of duty to others, regarding their receive self interest, and so be able to impose economic injustice to minority individuals and to groups(Mill, p.4).For George, it is not the majority that rules and must decide on rules to impose on others. It is the interest of the people that we should decide on what rules we impose. For George, the movement towards equality is important, wherein the majority or the overflowing are not the ones who have the office staff to get out rules.George states that when you remove the root of all problems, which is the individual right to kingdom, you are fetching it away from priority of occupation, the most illogical ground where come to willpower is defended. According to Henry George, Priority of occupation give exclusive and perfect(a) title to the surface of a globe on which, in the invest of nature, countless propagations succeed each other Had the men of the last generation any better right to the use of this world than we of this?Or the men of a hundred years ago? Or a yard years ago? Had the mound-builders, or the cave-dwellers, the contemporaries of the mastodon and the three-toed horse, or the generations simmer down further covering, who in dim aeons that we can think of only geologic periods, followed each other on the earth we now tenant for our infinitesimal day? ( George, VII.I.28) George points out those imposing rules such as individual rights to lan d would greatly induce poverty, thus creating inequality. When there is inequality, there is abuse from the people above, thus creating injustice in the system.Who would want to experience injustice? The real problem lies on the hands of the people who are on top, who are manipulating the situation for their benefits. It is a great burden to carry for the people affect, the masses, the ridiculous people who are work-stricken in mold for them to live, the ones who are sweating it all out, while the real people benefiting are on their warm offices relaxing, time lag for the funds to come to their pockets. George stresses that these inequalities must be resolved, and offers us a solution. That is to make the land a a unwashed property, a property for all, not only for the thick, thus reducing the shapes rich and poor, to a term better known as equals.These equal rights not only elicit the availability of these resources to everyone, but also the respect to other peoples rights. He appropriates his rights to the land with respect to what other people have, thus beingness able to distribute the use of these resources with the other people.Land Distribution. For Mill, a free society doesnt have laws that states that the government should take land from the rich people to give to the poor. Land distribution, or the distribution of the wealth of these rich people is not a law in a free society.The government has no right to take away these lands in order to give to the poor. That kind of action is not a manifestation of freedom because you are imposing that the lands be distributed. Freedom is being able to own lands that you desire, in a means that is lawful and does not violate any laws. Freedom does not entail that the government takes away if you have untold of that something. Freedom is letting you own what you are able to own, not distributing it to others.But George has a different point of view. He said that the unequal distribution of wealth is the real problem of the modern civilization. He thence express that if you look at it carefully, it is clear that this unequal distribution of wealth traces back to the institution of private property in land. George said that because of this institution, there is no increase in productive power that is beneficial for all the people, and the existence of this institution further worsens the situation. But for George, distribution of this private property, private monomania of land, doesnt pose any good effects or is infeasible (George, VI.II.1).But he proposes a way on how to deal with this problem, a way to remove an evil, he said, is by removing its cause. He explained that poverty intensifies as wealth increases, and wages are decreased while the productive power rises. The cause of all these is the monopoly of land, which is where the money comes from, the field of labor. So in order to rid us of this poverty, to level of the wages, only the way the law states that they should b e, then the individual will power of land should be ceased, thus substituting common ownership (George, VI.II.2).He then concluded that the chain of reasoning has light-emitting diode to this decision, wherein both by deduction and induction breaks down to the unequal ownership of land means unequal distribution of wealth. Unequal ownership would then be associated to the private ownerships, individual property in land. Thus, it follows that when you make land a common property, it removes the problem of unequal distribution of land.Money allocation. For Mill, he stressed that in a free society, the government as the populaces representative, should not have a veto on the way a person or a member of the society spends their money (Mill, p.97).But for George, he presents yet another different point of view. For him, the conception is in harmony, and so must be everything within it. Equality should be blueprintd and if we are to hope for equality, we must associate this with soci al reading and must have harmony with other reforms.He proposes to show that the humans does not deny people to aspire for something, does not deny the people to want something, yet in order for the society to have progress, there must be equality, wherein all motives must lead towards equality, not inequality. even up though there are objections, George sees it as a part of the solution, wherein the eradication of this evil is to provide equality, to stop the unjust distribution of wealth, the people should have equality. What we spend is also affected, for George we must work on towards that equality.Henry George said, each(prenominal) this I propose to show. I propose to meet all hard-nosed objections that can be raised, and to show that this simple measure is not only easy of application, but that it is a sufficient remedy for all the evils which, as modern progress goes on, arise from the greater and greater inequality in the distribution of wealth that it will substitute equality for inequality, plenty for want, justice for injustice, social strength for social weakness, and will open a grander and nobler advances of civilization.(George, VI.II.8)George proposes that everyone practice equality in order to maintain the justice for all. This includes all the actions towards peoples wants, including their budget and expenditures, wherein they are responsible for watching it closely.ReferencesGeorge, Henry. Progress and poverty An Inquiry into the Cause of Industrial Depressions and of Increase of Want with Increase of wealthiness The Remedy Garden City, NY Doubleday, Page & Co., 1879.Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. Pelican Books, 1859.