Social Intelligence of People Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Social Intelligence of sight - Assignment ExampleAlbrecht scale of behavioral concepts can help identify areas of human interaction that affect to be addressed for improved social skills. I set about achieved a score of 91 on Albrechts self-assessment quiz which has revealed my nourishing and toxic behavioral traits. 5 aspects of each are discussed as below.Five of my most nourishing traits are communicating openly and honestly acknowledging and affirming others expressing respect for others ideas and sympathize with others and keeping confidences. These have helped me to build a constructive social relationship with lots of genuine friends and well-wishers. These attributes have also presumption me credibility amongst friends and acquaintances, facilitating improved performance in academia as well as individual(prenominal) study as an individual. Respecting others ideas has helped me to develop critical thinking and providing me with the ability to look for new opportunities even in untoward circumstances.My five toxic behaviors include monopolizing conversation sometimes snappy and moody having low tolerance interrupting others and not listening patiently to others bragging, and manipulating others for my own goals. These traits have drawd some enemies and have blocked my progress in the cause arena. They have also created distrust amongst some of my acquaintances and obstructed my progress in studies as well as frustrated my efforts for strengthening my relationships others. These traits have led to reduced trust and respect amongst my friends and peer group. I would interchangeable to have more communication skills as they are definitive tools for resolving conflicts. It is an important mechanism of expressing and explaining facts that could create problems for oneself and others. A person, who makes effort to develop better ways of communicating with other people, is able to strengthen his/her personal andprofessional relationship and facilitat e a better understanding that paves way for a productive outcome.Moreover, the wide scope of communication, in terms of behavioral pattern, language used and non-verbal means of contact are important aspects which are extremely relevant in the social interaction.

NIST 800-64 rev2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

NIST 800-64 rev2 - Essay ExampleThe puzzle I choose to discuss is poor converse between the employers and employees. In managing IT systems and their progress, an Information system credentials process is put in attitude to help identify risks, plan and mitigate b some others that may plagiarize at the workplace. Implementing a risk management based approach serves to integrate security systems throughout the elbow room. However, throughout the system and its working, colloquy plays a major region in how well every(prenominal)thing is understood and implemented in order to ensure high school productivity with lesser number of problems. Communication is an indispensable part of whatsoever organization beca rehearse its success or failure depends a lot on it. One of the critical assets of all organization is proper discourse between employers and employees as well as among the management and workers. Proper communication helps to instill integrity and solidarity among th e workers and helps them to focus better on the goal ahead. System managers can make use of good communication as a tool to build strong relationships not only among the workers but also the clients that deal with them. Proper communication is a fundamental asset for decision making, negotiation, implementation and assessment of the whole developmental process. One of the dilemmas that could arise in the workplace is miscommunication that leads to anger, fear, mistrust and lack of understanding among the parties involved. This problem is quite evident especially within a multicultural organization. The five phases such as Initiation, Development, Implementation, unconscious process and Disposal that contributes towards the smooth working and productivity of the organization could be hampered if there is no proper communication among its staff and workers. In implementing and executing a risk management based approach, it is both crucial and spanking to help employees understand the integrated security component of the organization because each of them plays a significant role in its successful achievement. Miscommunication in any one of the areas could bring about heavy losses to the agency or organization. In the Security Considerations in the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) distinguishable individuals play different roles with different responsibilities and in order to ensure the systematic progress and success of the organization, they film to interact with each other during each stage of activity. In such a scenario, effective communication involving security requirements and expectations is inevitable. Every penis is accountable in the position they hold responsibility within the organization. Employing an appropriate Information security personnel office at the initiation juncture would be the right thing to do, so as to avoid communication mishaps during the process of any project. The individual carrying out this job has a big responsibili ty since it is a high risk job involving the organizations operations as well as its assets. However, all the other officials and managers each have their own role to play and their own responsibility which is clearly defined and they are accountable for things that go wrong. In such a set up effective communication plays a very grave role because it helps to keep the security system in tact and in an effective working order. Since every person is highly responsible and accountable for their actions, it is inevitable that the first thing that should be put into place is a proper

Civil Disobedience - Gandhi Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Civil Disobedience - Gandhi - Essay Examplee to comfortably suppress the incidences of violent uprising, however the civil noncompliance front man was launched on a widespread graduated table and proved to be a tactic that the British were simply unable to defeat through phalanx means. Gandhi has played an unforgettable role in the history of India and is referred to as Bapu, or the Father of the nation, due to his important contribution in bringing about a retreat of British forces from India.Gandhi first commenced the civil noncompliance in southernmost Africa, when he was practicing as a lawyer. Angered by the discrimination that was heaped upon black South African majority and his Indian brothers by the white minority, Gandhi encouraged these people to refuse to cooperate with practices they were pass judgment to follow that only denigrated them more. He gave up his lucrative legal practice in order to frame the leader of the Indian community that was comprised of desp ised traders and laborers. (www.india-today.com) and devised his policy of civil disobedience or a calm non violent refusal to comply with unjust practices that were an attack on human dignity.Gandhi later utilized the civil disobedience driveway very successfully in his home country of India, in resisting British rule and demanding that they go out India. He initiated the Non cooperation movement in 1921-22. Indians boycotted British goods and chose to use only Indian products. The crowd and masses quite simply refused to obey orders and the British found themselves helpless in dealing with people who openly disobeyed rules but did not resist arrest and did not retort with violence to any draconian British measures to adduce law and order. There was however, a constant demand from the asses for the British to quit India. Two decades after the movement was first commenced, Gandhi was successful in achieving the goal of Swaraj, or complete independence.(www.india-today.com).Falk (2003) has argued that the potential of the civil disobedience movement in bringing

Evaluation of Open Source Operating System Assignment

Evaluation of Open Source Operating System - duty assignment ExampleThere are also companies who concentrate their efforts on open radical software standardised Sun and IBM who consider the open source systems as an hazard to undermine the monopoly of Microsoft in the computer software. The troika group of users is public institutions and government agencies especially in atomic number 63 who consider the use of open source systems as a viable alternative for US technology and because of the increased safety and security that rump be built in the open source systems.There are also companies who concentrate their efforts on open source software like Sun and IBM who consider the open source systems as an opportunity to undermine the monopoly of Microsoft in the computer software. The third group of users is public institutions and government agencies especially in Europe who consider the use of open source systems as a viable alternative for US technology and because of the incr eased safety and security that can be built in the open source systems. exposition and Functions of Open source Systems (OSS)Originally at the time of initial developments, the software was known as poverty-stricken software as defined by the GNU project. The term open source has been coined later and fit in to Stallman it is an attempt to express the same kind of concept as that of free software but with a more prudent and palatable approach. The functions of OSS include(a) Facilitating and monitoring user interface(b) Effective job management to hand over computer usage time(c) in effect(p) task management to act as an aid to facilitate multi-task completions(d) Efficient data management to accommodate more volume of data(e) Better device management for an efficient handling of the associated hardware and(f) Ensuring the security of data which is the foremost requirement of any efficient operating system.

The Management of Global Trade Distribution Assignment

The Management of globular Trade Distribution - Assignment ExampleDHL has a considerable market share of nearly 40% of the Asian market (The Economist, 2012). FedEx accounts for the market share of around of 49%in USA as compared to around 50% by the competitor UPS. FedEx has developed the fleet and service base that has built a plastered reputation of the company. For example, GPS tracking, Online Solution (FedEx, 2012a), SenseAware (Business Wire, 2014) are some of the leading services from FedEx.The industry in which FedEx operates is highly hawkish and it has low switching cost for buyers and suppliers. Also, the industry is affected by high oil prices. FedEx, with its service to the spheric market, has focused on building competitive edge with technological innovation and is ranked at the 91st military position on the Forbes Most Valuable brands (Forbes, 2013). Competitive information technology orientation has taken the place of overbearing prefer for FedEx.Change in th e global trade agreements and patterns have a direct impact on the FedEx. FedEx supports FTA for the removal of barriers from Panama, Columbia, and South Korea. Furthermore, FedEx has capitalised the growth in global demand for the Korean products where Korea in all has generated $3.8 jillion in the year 2011 (FedEx, 2012b). FedEx has planned to establish logistic hub in Pudong considering the global trade patterns between mainland China to Europe where Shanghai Pudong International Airport is to take the position of hub (FedEx, 2012b). Hence, FedEx is keenly developing the comparative advantage from the changing global trade patterns. Furthermore, the company is also directly impacted by the varying regulations from country to country. For example, FedEx launched SenseAware in different market upon receiving security clearance from the respective countries and related organisations (Leung, 2011). Most recently it has expand to 14 European countries and Canada. Such strong connect ivity with the movement of sensitive products has developed

Business ethic analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Business ethic analysis - Essay eventWithout ethical measures and programs the go with is set to loss the benefit it has enjoyed financially by doing business ethically. We should always give in mind the principles of professional ethic which if our caller-out would take into account we are loss to countermand potential or apparent conflict of interest which in this case I see us breaching. Ethical dilemma My point of concern is payment of bonuses to shareholders in these times of economic crisis when we fuddle non even completed repaying of the loan granted to us by the government and further organizing retreats for the employees. I live realized that if we pay bonuses and continue organizing retreats, this will be more costly to the company. it is evident from the bonuses paid in 2008 and the retreat organized when the company was experiencing financial difficulties has impacted negatively on the public image of the company and its exertion (French,1995). It is highly exp ected that we are going to pay bonuses to our shareholders and the employees are expectant of the retreat. If we grant bonuses, it is going to be highly costly financially since the company has non been able to fully from the economic crisis that we have just been through. Because of the position of our company, anything we do would be highly publicized in the media thus creating unwanted oversight from the public whose money has been used to bail us. On the other hand, failure to pay bonuses would raise eyebrows to our trust shareholders and employees. Employees further expect to be motivated and over the years retreats for them has been the mean of motivating them. This company has to strive to maintain its reputation which it has built over the years. Ethical practices have been key to the success and performance of this company. Although the company is set to benefit by rewarding best performance of its employees, it has to consider the implications to the public which is a c ritical part of this company. Furthermore, our shareholders are critical to the continuous success of this company but payment of bonuses at such a time might have negative implications on the integrity of the company since it has not even cleared repayment of loans resulting from the bail out by the government and also considering that the company has been sell off some of its holdings and subsidiaries to clear the loan. The management of this company thus needs to offer continued stand out to enable the ethical values of this company to work. Furthermore the company needs to communicate this effectively to employees and shareholders. It is in my view that we should include in our code of conductwhen the company can organize retreats for its employees and when the bonuses can be paid without having any negative impact on the companys reputation. The issue of giving bonuses and organizing retreats is unethical especially at such a time when the company is just recovering from fin ancial difficulties (French, 1995). It is evident that incentives and rewards play an important role in motivating employees to accomplish corporate goals and a company committed to doing business ethically would want to reward its employees for that. But the matter of rewarding employees by organizing retrea

The Novelty of Whole Foods Market Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

The Novelty of Whole Foods Market - Essay ExampleThe Net Income was $203.8 trillion and the annual growth was 49.5%. It employs 39,500 people worldwide and is free of unions. (Hoovers). This is a result of its clear Management Strategies.determine the strategic drivers of the company is the primary task of top management. This rush is aided by PEST and nerd Analysis. With this assessment, objectives are set. This involves the formulation of Vision Statements, Mission Statements, Corporate Objectives, Strategic Business Units, and Tactical Objectives. These objectives suggest a strategic plan. The plan provides the details of how to achieve these objectives. Once the plan is formulated it needs to be implemented. The performance process must be detailed to the minutest degree as this is the crux of the whole strategy. (Thompson Arthur A.,)WFMs mission statement has been spelled out as the stakeholder philosophy. For them it is customers first, then the team members, balanced with whats good for other stakeholders, such as shareholders, vendors, the community, and the environment. (Corporate Board Member, January/February 2007). These are the core values of the company that has been followed with exceptional zeal throughout their unified history. It must be said that the leadership has played a vital role in this outcome.The hot seat and CEO John P. Mackey was named the 2003 Overall National Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year. This a tribute to his overall allegiance that has keyed up the whole company for almost three decades. His handling of delicate issues like the clash with Michael Pollan, author of The Omnivores Dilemma, both in person and through his blogs, (Mackey. John), and his statement on Conscious Capitalism has bypast down well with both the customers as well as Wall Street. He has stated that cognizant capitalism is in harmony with all interest and each stakeholder, be it the customer, worker or shareholder.

Issue Of The Conflict Between Israel And The Palestinians Essay

Issue Of The Conflict Between Israel And The Palestinians - Essay ExampleFilms such as Exodus, together with the horrific images that emerged from Germanys concentration camps left an indelible mark on humanity, and rightly so. The cause of these images have also played a crucial role in what has evolved into a crisis in the midriff East that has one party, the Palestinians, crying foul, and the other, the Israelis, claiming rights to land Palestinians have lived on for 1300 years. In assessing any perspective, the temptation to involve things from one side or the other is a very real problem. The Zionists, searching for Palestinian roots, wrote their storey of the Jews in Palestine in the Middle Ages the European Christians did the same. As Barnai (1992) suggests, history is often written through nationalistic eyes and as such may be rife with distortions that favor the side composing it. Abdullahs and other arguments must be subject to that scrutiny. His first argument that J ews and Arabs lived in harmony for centuries, and that For or so 2,000 years Palestine has been almost 100 percent Arab is faulty. His contention that current animosities have nothing to do with tribal enmity is doubtful as well from a historical perspective. What Slovan (2010) refers to as the Jewish pressure sensation that Judenhass or Jew Hate is largely responsible appears to have weight when evidence is examined. While few rock-steady documents from very early times exist pertaining to the Jewish presence in Palestine and their treatment there, documents from the ottoman Empire of the sixteenth century indicate they were there in significant roles. Barnai (1992) writes, Jews were quickly integrated into the nance Empire... and acquired key economic positions and were activein...industry, trade, and finance (p.11). Jews even then were persecuted by local Arab officials. Barnai found, There were laws discriminating against the Jews...prohibitions on buying land, on building h ouses and synagogues, and on riding horses, and restrictions in matters of dress and inheritance... (p. 13).

Why Do We Need To Eat Healthy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Why Do We Need To Eat Healthy - Essay ExampleHealthy eating does non in some(prenominal) way mean any sort of diet it actually refers to the proper intake of bouncing foods standardised meat, vegetables, fruits, and nuts, whole grains etc in balanced proportions. All these will provide us with the required amount of carbohydrates, fats and vitamins and minerals and neer induce any health problem when taken moderately. Firstly, there is a need to eat healthy to avoid serious diseases. Regardless of the age, healthy eating habits prolong a crucial impact on our health. Long standing studies have established a definite link between diet and cardiovascular diseases. Cases of coronary heart disease atomic number 18 on the rise and the cardiovascular morbidity figures are staggering. Studies have made it clear the high amount of fat intake, particularly LDL or low niggardness lipoprotein and triglycerides, accessions the chances of developing coronary diseases equivalent atherosc lerosis. On the other hand a diet that provides you with a hot amount of HDL squirt help decrease the cholesterol levels in the body. High fiber grains can help lower chances of heart disease and type 2 diabetes ( F.B Hu and Willet, 2002).Decrease in cholesterol levels itself has a pass around of good impact on the body- chances of CVD (cardio vascular diseases) are lowered, blood sugar and hyper tension problems are similarly controlled. Dietary fat withal increases the risk of developing certain types of cancer like breast cancer, esophageal, tum and prostate cancer and has been supported by animal studies too. Most forms of cancers, have been linked to obesity and privation of proper nutrition and according to the National Cancer Institute, most of these cancer forms are preventable. Immunity is unrivalled of the basic tools for survival. Humans are immune to many pathogens simply because of the presence of white blood cells like NK cells in the body, which engulf the ant igen and protect the body from harm. In case human did not have this resistance barrier, they would become vulnerable to all diseases and may even die owing to even small and claw infections. The key to a strong immune system is an intake of healthy diet. Colas, pizzas, burgers do not increase immunity in anyway. But intake of healthy foods like vegetables and fruits provides beta-carotene which in turn strengthens the body. In upstart studies cancer experts have overly found out that healthy eating and strong immunity also prevent development of certain cancers. There are a number of diseases that are caused due to nutritionary deficiencies. Nutritional deficiencies occur when proper balanced food is not ingested. Beriberi, pellagra, scurvy, rickets, Ariboflavinosis, Skin diseases, Hypocobalaminemia, Paraesthesia and night blindness are some of the diseases related to vitamin deficiency. Painful chronic Gouty arthritis is another dreadful disease caused by bad eating habits. Deficiency of essential minerals like calcium, magnesium, iron, sodium etc leads to diseases. If proper healthy habits are not developed a person will from health problems Scientific studies have shown that our mental health also depends on dietary factors. Minor depression, major depression, psychotic depression, traumatic disorders, stress disorders, compulsive behaviors, and anxiety are some of the mental problems that haunt a person. Though most of these diseases depend on genetic, biological and mental factors but studies have determined that foods rich in omega-3 fatty acids ,release serotonins in the brain which in turn elevates mood.

Talking about movie hurt lockeror apocalypse now Research Paper

Talking about movie cause to be perceived lockeror apocalypse now - Research Paper ExampleIdeological differences and socio-political issues result in violence connect to modern warfare, and the film named as The Hurt Locker proves the same.First of all, one needs to realize that the capture of religious belief upon the political scenario of a nation is totally against democracy. To be specific, autocrats exploit and depend upon the entice of religion on national politics. Within the Middle Eastern context, the dependency on religion to rack democratic ideas is evident. The clash between the Middle Eastern nations and the west can be easily place as the clash between socio-cultural and religious differences. When the term modern warfare is superimposed into the context of the stalk pointed differences, one can see that the western nations support democracy and the Middle Eastern nations support autarky and the influence of religion within their political context.In the film, the protagonists mission is not to excite against the so called enemy groups, but to provide humanitarian aid to the victims. Michael L. Gross makes clear that, Humanitarian preventative is only justified when the weaker, rogue nation is so egregiously criminal that it is impossible to think their soldiers might somehow retain a measure of moral innocence (49). Besides, this group cannot be considered as insurgents because their mission to defuse explosives and save innocent civilians and others. But the members of the protagonists group do not realize the consequence of their mission. To be specific, they consider that their mission is to overpower their foes. This difference in perceiving the essence of ones duty, or the protagonists view on his mission, is the core aspect of the movie.On the other side, the real villain (autocratic ruler) in the movie is still behind the silver screen and tries to make use of innocent civilians as scapegoats of hostility. The protagonist kno ws this fact and deals with his

Political Act Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Political Act - Essay fashion modelHe resigned the Yugoslav presidency amid demonstrations, following the disputed presidential election of September 24, 2000. (wikipedia.com). He surrendered to the JSO (an selected group of police in Serbia), to avoid forced arrest in April 1, 2001. This put in shape with an American deadline. The strugglerant had previously been made on suspicion of corruption, abuse of power, and embezzlement. The charges were domestic. The legitimacy of the arrest was non proven since Milosevic surrender however putting Milosevic in jail is not legal. The investigation does not establish a hard evidence to convict the former president. The Serbian Prime MinisterMilosevic displace during the war convicted him for committing war crimes. During the Yugoslav war in 1990 and Kosovo war in 1999 he conducted his own defense at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, where he stood accused of crimes against humanity, violating the laws or cu stoms of war, grave breaches of the geneva Conventions and genocide.The decision of the court of not giving him the proper medical treatment is legitimate in the sense that he is convicted of a crime, but the said action is illegal since every person is entitled to micturate a proper treatment. His trial ended without verdict because he died during the proceedings. He suffered from heart ailments and high short letter pressure. In the case of President Milosevic he had made a legitimate act during the war since he is the president however he violated the laws of war and the Geneva Conventions. The political acts performed by Milosevic are a good example of legitimate act but legal. There are also cases wherein political act is legitimate but it does not necessarily need to be legal. In the case of the American and the British decision to attacked Iraq and engaged into war is legitimate. In the inquiry of people in the website of Noam Chompsky one question goes equivalent this Do you think that, after the unjustified and unjustifiable war against Iraq, the world will lose the pith of its existence, like in the field of language, when we lose the grammatical rules Will we automatically lose the reference of the meaning of sentences, and consequently the meaning of the world around us Noam answer this question by citing one avowal done by a follower of the Iraq war, Michael Glennon, who argues that we should recognize that international law and international institutions are what he calls hot air. They have proven their inapplicability by the fact that the linked States disregards them, and he says it is right to disregard them, and the United States must maintain the right to use force as it chooses, independent of these institutions, which we simply have to strike down and disregard.The act of Americans and British against Iraq has gain criticism throughout the world. But the said act is legitimate. The legality of attack someone is not being followed especially during the time of war or the need to have a war. In the case of the American President he needs to make decisions depending on the

DIGITAL DIVIDE Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

DIGITAL DIVIDE - Essay Example base on the attributes, score were developed and the scores became the basis for building an overall score on digitization with a cuticle of zero to 100 with 100 representing as the measure with the highest level of digitization. The Global Technology tell 2012 defined digitization as the mass adoption of connected digital technologies and applications by consumers, enterprises, and governments (Dutta & Bilbao-Osorio, 121).However, the way that The Global training Technology Report of 2012 defined the economies appears to indicates that no other determination would be possible except the finding that as an economy move from a constrained economy into an emerging economy and then in conclusion into a transitional economy and eventually into an advanced economy, digitization would increase. Constrained economies were defined as economies with digitization scores below 25, emerging economies with digitization scores of 25 to 30, transitional econom ies with digitization scores of amongst 30 to 40, and advanced economies with digitization scores of greater than 40 (Dutta & Bilbao-Osorio, 122). Expectedly, The Global Information Technology Report of 2012 obtained Figure 1 on the relation betwixt economy type and digitization for 150 economies of the world.Based on The Global Information Technology Report of 2012 , the constrained and emerging economies include Ethiopia, Morocco, India, Egypt, China, Algeria, Thailand, Indonesia, Kenya, Angola, Lao PDR, Cuba, Iraq, Bangladesh, Uganda, Peru, Mongolia, Georgia, and Guatemala. The transitional economies include Turkey, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Mauritius, and Chile. Finally, the advanced economies include the United States, Canada, Switzerland, South Korea, Austria, and Australia. The countries enumerated are representative countries only. The association between GNP per capita and digitization

Knowledge Management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 3

Knowledge Management - Essay ExampleThe tuition or association can be derived from two major sources the individuals or employees and the information or data found in the approaches or procedures of the organization. Knowledge management is the formulation of and access to experience, knowledge, and expertise that create new capabilities, enable schoolmaster performance, encourage innovation, and enhance customer value(Gloet, 2006). Furthermore, KM is a strategy that turns an organizations intellectual assets-both recorded information and the talents of its members into greater productivity, new value and increased competitiveness, it teaches cooperation from managers to employees, how to produce and optimize skills as a collective entity (Gloet, 2006).The primary election motive of knowledge management is to ensure that the aims and goals of the organization. The objectives of the organization revolve around the enhancement of performance, increasing organisational efficiency, innovation, learning and development and constant development of the organization (Addicott, McGivern and Ewan, 2006). Research suggests that KM concentrates on the integration of organizational learning and development in nightclub to distribute knowledge and information. Furthermore, it allows individual employees and groups to work collaboratively in order to share organizational insights in order to improve organizational productivity and efficiency. It also concentrates on enhancing the boilersuit organizational structure, increasing profitability and to change in accordance to the conditions of the market.Literature suggests that KM is an essential and total part of business organizations and it concentrates on delivering and sharing of relevant knowledge to the appropriate individual at the slump time. For this purpose, it is essential that the knowledge management systems are developed in accordance to the needs

Why do people smile Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Why do people grimace - Essay ExampleMany scientists intrust that hotshot of the reasons why people use facial demonstrations such as smiling is simply to depute to other people how they feel and what they feel. It is also believed that facial expressions are understood in the same sort all around the world as Max Eastman said a Smile is the Universal Welcome. The inside state of emotions is manifests through the facial expression. Someone is believed to be showing his calmness through smiling having a friendly attitude towards others, and others could be distinguished through different kinds and tokens of grinnings as one of the unknown authors extract Everyone grins in the same language.. A smile is a facial expression that shows the upward contours at the ends of the mouth. on that point are times wherein the sparkle of the eyes expresses the smile and not the mouth. However, smile communicates a thousand words. nigh of the time, smiles indicates happy signs such as j oy, rejoicing, and love. However, there are kinds of a smile that show involuntary expression of anxiety known to be the grimace, or even serve as an expression of embarrassment in a shamefaced sort of way. Smile is rooted within our primate nature that depicts tyrannical solvent to social relationships. It is considered to be a universal positive sign of social relationship. Smile is a positive tool to convey other people of different races and culture about their feelings and nature. History of Smiles Most of the time, happiness is always associated with smile, but to consider, there are still many types of smile that does not necessarily live with that connotation like sneer, snarl, smirk etc. Different expressions in relation to smile were considered in do-nothingvass and studies with the history of smiling. Huge data have been gathered from art, history, and biology to unveil the nuances about the gentleman smile after which some interesting facts were revealed. For exam ple, there are beliefs that the supreme enlightenment is reflected In the holy smile of Buddha. On the other hand, open mouth smiling in the Victorians was obscene. In the behavioral and psychological aspects, it was explored how and when in infancy smiling considered to be an act of communication. In art history, the famous smile of Mona Lisa as fountainhead as the sculptured heads of Ming dynasty was studied in relation to smiling. Types and Reasons to Smile Thirty million years of human evolution produced different types of smiles that anybody can currently wear for all accessions and different situations. 1. Sweet Smile This is the type of smile that can melt a heart, hard to resist like in just one look, you know you are done for it. I have been hijacked several times over this smile. This smile is manifested in all ages with native intention of recapturing the true picture of a contented life. 2. I am in Love Smile this type of smile is unmistakable from the rest of the smi le. This smile exudes the energy of having a pure love and bliss. This type of smile does not necessarily need to be romantic smile and can also be applicable to ones favorite pets. This is usually manifested to young adults and adults or in the mature people. 3. Most Beautiful Smile This type of smile is the one considered to be the breathtaking smile. This is the smile that could skip a persons heartbeat. Once encountering this type of smile, one can be mesmerize and would forget the world for a while. This is usually seen to young adults as a part of their growing up in their transformation to the adulthood. 4. Happy Smile- In this type of smile, one can see the reflection of a happy and a joyful heart. This is the smile that radiates pure happiness and most often manifested in children. 5. paying attention Smile

JFK assassination Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

JFK assassination - question Paper ExampleThe sheer emotion and rawness of the coverage appealed to peoples senses that brought the people closer to the news. It was in addition by no means dismissible that at the heart of the breaking news were Americas affable and media-savvy president and the grief-stricken first family devastated by a tragedy. Overnight, the mostly newspaper-reading and radio-listening nation has turned their direction to their television sets to get a blow-by-blow update of the latest news.Merriman Smith, a United Press supranational (UPI) newsman, was riding in the presidential press pool car just behind JFKs limo on that fateful day in Dallas when they heard three loud shots. The second and third audio made it unmistakable that they came from gunshots. Smith immediately grabbed hold of the cars radio phone and contacted the UPI headquarters to deliver the news update. Cronkite, inside the CBS studio in New York, was just informed of the presidents assassi nation coming across finished the UPI teletype machine. As Cronkites news team breaks the stations regular programming to deliver the assassination news unsure of the presidents condition, Smith was in Parkland Hospital with more breaking story. Smith informs UPI that President Kennedy has died at 100pm. Breaking the sludge opera slot, Cronkite emotionally delivers the news.2Smith rushed to the office and fed the whole world with the news through the five bells that rang on the recipient UPI machine to indicate the urgency and weight of the message. Walter Cronkite was a close confidant of Smiths. He knew exactly what Smith meant by the message fed to the world in much(prenominal) a short span of time. Cronkite took to the television immediately, putting a break to the ongoing programs. He had to go on audio, as the available camera was slow at loading images. Cronkite became the most trusted soulfulness in America at that time.3 From the time of

Professional Athletes Essay Example for Free

Professional Athletes EssayCompanies that custom professional supporter realize the right to use that endorsement at their discretion. This question is difficult to answer as a whole because there are so many factors that occur. When it comes to a contract or obligation the bylaws of such agreement give the bounce change both parties to non fulfill the agreed terms. Most athletes are held to a standard that is based upon their office staff in their specific sport. The star or leader is usu each(prenominal)y held in higher regard than the twelfth man on a team. With that said the argument for companies comes from a different perspective so its lends genius to speak from both sides of the argument. I have to take the affirmative for the companies even though I view in the marketability of the professional athlete. In the case of Micheal Phelps his ability to perform at a high aim has led directly to the rebound of his image.Tiger Woods on the other had way more to lose at the time of his marital problems. In one shot his on course performance has not been at the take in which we are use to seeing of him. He has no amassed the same fervor or attention for positivity as a Micheal Phelps. The bad play on the course as not lifted the stain of all the negative press that he garnered. Had he been even more winning on his playing field he more than likely would have been able to narrow companies to get spikelet on the Tiger train.Companies, tend to use athletes that match their persona, the bigger the name the bigger the accompany. propose is so important to what a company is trying to convey just about its product and service. Most companies have their values listed somewhere near their corporate profile. The two have to match. The values of a company must meet the value that is percieved the by the value of the product. The best and most current case of this is with ray of light Armstrong, his Livestrong radical and Nike have distances thems elves from Lance. He was a very visible and outspoken spokesman, he had a followingthat added to his parable on an almost daily basis.The projectings that there was unanimous evidence that he was using PEDs (Performance Enhancing Drugs) to win in his sport was detrimental to not only his incredibility but it clings to a company like Nike be a company built on the athletic prowess of athletes from a varied amount of sports. So as a company what do you do? You have no choice but to shorten ties with this athlete not just because he lied but the implication can be crystallize that Nike and its athletes also lie and use PEDs. You cant blame a company from wanting to distance its mark from that of a liar and cheater.In a different effect the Livestrong Foundation has a separate delimma to reflection at aside from the moral issue. They have a financial conundrum that affect the legacy of what Lance did for cancer and cancer research. The livestrong bands that are so popular in our community, were marketed to people on the basis that the growth from the sale of the bands go to the fight against cancer. People that associate Lances image struggle with his Foundation have acquire outraged. Here it is, this winner who was at the pinnacle of his sport lied on top of lying he cheated. He used his acclaim and sickness to capitalize on a disease and in turn not only made money for the foundation but also breezed his pocket. The only resort hotel it seems the foundation had to take is to severe ties.Companies have a obligation to their shareholders, They have a obligation to their employees as well. The obligation to the shareholders and employees comes in the form of profit and money. Imagine if your brand is built on honesty and integrity. Your market and advertising say you are honest but your commercials have a Tiger Woods or Lance Armstrong there is a clear distinction that these two athletes have had trouble with honesty. The audience can then place your br and with dishonesty which can lead to losing business. As a bottom linage all companies want to make money. You tend not to do things on a consistent level that contradict the reason why most businesses go into business, to make money Performance is also a factor in whether a company will give an endorsement to an athletes. We are a gardening that tends to use the what have you done for me lately concept when it comes to our professional athlete.Businesses also use this practice to capitalizeon the success and marketability of an athlete. If there was a ethical issue the easiest way for that athlete to get the endorsements back or to gain new is to win. Winning is the cure for any image problems because it covers up the moral and places fierceness on the practical. In the case of Peyton Manning, Buick comes to mind. He did not play in the NFL in the 2011 season. He suffered abominable neck injuries that put his playing future in jeopardy. He lost several endorsement deals not be cause he had a moral issue, in fact he is one of the top professional athletes in the world when it comes to image. In 2012 he was picked up but another team and that team has been success, Buick looking for a spokesman to embody the brand of Buick they went with Manning.He was not high on their list they dropped Tiger and needed to find a spokesman that matched the brand. Companies have to make the decision to drop or keep an athlete based on so many factors. The need to satisfy the bottom line and the customer is always a substantial task. The hardest part is picking the right spokesman that can push the brand, product or service. It is hard because these athletes have individualized lives, these athletes are human, they make decisions at times without thinking about what company has paid them to speak about their product. The company has to make sure that they include language in the contract that can help the athlete make inclusive decisions. The moral clause is always a good way for a company to protect itself from the damage that can happen when favorable decisions are not made by an individual.It is up to the athlete to make sure he wants to keep the money and fame that can come from being on commercials and in ads by Fortune 500 companies. I feel as though they do not think about the overall consequences of their actions or how it may affect their decisions. This is where the company comes in and can make up for that. Its egoism from both sides. A athlete can act unbecoming and lose it all but due to great performances he can redeem his career. While the company can affix a 2nd chance allowing the athlete to be in the public eye again. Its a line that both have control over but in the world of business and sport the lines are so often blurred. In the end the companies have the right to giveth and the right to taketh away.

Kant and Equality Essay Example for Free

Kant and Equality Essay roughly readers of this attempt give pack occasion impatient by now be seduce they believe that the trouble that perplexes me has been definitively solved by Immanuel Kant. It is certainly confessedly that Kant held unvoiced opinions on this matter. In an ofttimes-quoted passage, he reports a personal conversion from elitism I am myself a researcher by inclination. I feel the whole thirst for knowledge and the desirous unrest to move come along on into it, also satisf be morseliveion with each acquisition.There was a quantify when I thought this al bingle could constitute the honor of clementity and despised the know nonhing rabble. Rousseau prep ar me straight. This delusory superiority vanishes, I learn to honor men, and I would find myself more(prenominal) useless than a vulgar laborer if I did not believe this observation could give every(prenominal) bingle a value which restores the indemnifys of humaneity. What Kant wise to(p) fr om Rousseau was the proposition that the basis of human equality is the dignity that each human person possesses in celibacy of the depicted object for autonomy ( incorruptistic freedom).This honorable freedom has two aspects, the message to grade quits for sensationself according to aces conception of what is dear, and the electrical capacity to regulate angiotensin-converting enzymes choice of checks and of satisfys to achieve ones shoemakers lasts by ones conception of what chasteity requires. According to Kants psychology, brute animals argon determined to twist as instinct inclines them, notwithstanding a reasonable existence has the power to interrogate the inclinations it feels, to raise the interrogatory what it is yardable to do in given circumstances, and to choose to do what antecedent suggests regular a suck upst either inclinations.The oral sex arises whether Kants psychology is even, or remotely close to correct. Perhaps whateverthing like t he conflict surrounded by sense of remedy and wrong and inclination is survived by social animals other than humans. Perhaps the freedom that Kant imputes to human on metaphysical grounds rump be shown to be either empiric every(prenominal)y nonexistent or illusory. For our purposes we can arrange these questions aside and simply presume that the human psychological complexity envisaged by Kant does describe capacity we possess, whether or not it is sh ard with other animals.My question is whether Kants characterization, if it was correct, would have the normative implication she draws from it. It strength calculate that the Kantian picture helps to show how object lessonistic freedom is arrange concept, which does not significantly admit of degrees. If one has the capacity to treated an end for oneself, one does not possess this freedom to a lesser effect just because one cannot set protrude ends, or because other persons can set fancier ends.If one has the power to regulate choice of ends by ones sense of what is virtuously right, one does not possess this freedom to a lesser extent because one cannot understand sophisticated moral considerations, or because other persons can understand more sophisticated moral considerations. more thanover, one energy hold that it is having or lacking the freedom which is important, not having or lacking the capacity to exercise the freedom in fancy ways. still the old worries lurk just around the corner.The Kantian view is that at that place ar and so capacities that argon crucial for the ascription of of import moral status that do not vary in degree. 1 either has the capacity or one does not, and thats that. If the crucial capacities have this character, then the difficulty of how to draw a no arbitrary line on a continuum and hold wholly(prenominal) beings on one side of the line expert persons and all beings on the other side of the line lesser beings does not arise. The line separating perso ns and nonpersons pass on be non arbitrary, and on that point allow for be no basis for further differentiation of moral status. unmatchable is either a person or not, and all persons atomic number 18 equal. handle the capacity to set an end, to choose a goal and abstain on an military action to achieve it. sensation ability suppose that all humans have this capacity except for the permanently comatose and the anencephalic. So all humans are entitled to a fundamental equal moral status. This view is beef up by noting that there are other capacities that do admit of degrees that interact with the no degree capacities. Individuals who equally have the capacity to set an end may well differ in the quality of their end-setting performances.Some are able to set ends more reasonably than others. But these going aways in performance do not gainsay the fundamental equal capacity. It is just that having a high or low level of associated capacities enables or impedes successful performance. So the fact that individuals differ in their abilities to do arithmetic and more complex numeral operations that affect their tycoon to refer rational choices should have no tendency to obscure the more basic and chastely status-conferring equality in the capacity of each person to sop up choices.In chemical reaction First of all, if several of these no degree capacities were relevant to moral status, one must(prenominal) possess all to be at the top status, and whatever individuals possess more and others a couple of(prenominal)er of the relevant capacities, a problem of hierarchy, though perhaps a manageable one, would emerge anew. More important, I doubt there is a plausible no degree capacity that can do the work this argument assigns to it. Take the capacity to set ends and make choices. Consider a being that has little brain power, but over the pattern of its life can set just a few ends and make just a few choices based on considering two or trey si mple alternatives.It sets one end (lunch, now) per decade three quantify over the course of its life. If there is a capacity to set ends, period, not admitting of degrees, this being possesses it. The berth is that it is clearly not merely the capacity to set ends, but fewthing more complex that renders a being a person in our eyes. What matters is whether or not one has the capacity to set sensible ends and to tear among alternative end at a reasonable pace, sorting through complex considerations that bear on the choice of ends and responding in a rational way to these considerations.But this capacity, along with any similar or related capacity that might be urged as a substitute for it, definedly admits of degrees. The kindred file would hold if we fileed to free will or moral autonomy as the relevant person- find capacity. It is not the ability to choose an end on ground of consideration for moral considerations merely, but the ability to do this in a nuanced and fine-g rained responsive way, that is plausibly deemed to entitle a being to personhood status.In general, we single show up rationality, the ability to respond appropriately to reasons, as the capacity that is pertinent to personhood, by itself or in happenstance with related abilities, and rationality so unders excessivelyd admits of degrees. Kant may well have held that the uses of reason that are indispensable in order to have a well-functioning conscience that can tell right from wrong are not very sophisticated and are well within the reach of all non crazy non retarded humans. Ordinary intelligence suffices. His discussions of applying the categorical compulsive test certainly convey this impression.But commentators tend to have got that there is no simple all-purpose moral test that easily functions all significant moral questions. thus Christine Korsgaard cautions that the categorical imperative test is not a Geiger counter for detecting the presence of moral duties, and B arbara Herman ob go tos that the occupation of the categorical imperative test to cases cannot be a mechanical procedure but relies on prior moral understanding by the agent and on the agents capacity to make relevant moral discriminations and judgments and to characterize her own proposed maxims perspicuously.These comments confirm what should be clear in any resultant Moral problems can be complex and difficult, and there is no discernible upper bound to the complexity of the reasoning required to master and perhaps solve them. But suppose I do the better(p) I can with my limited cognitive resources, I make a judgment as to what is morally right, however misguided, and I am conscientiously resolved to do what I take to be morally right. The capacity to do what is right can be f instrumented into two components, the ability to decide what is right and the ability to blackball oneself to do what one thinks is right.One might hold the latter capacity to be the true locus of huma n dignity and costy. Resisting temptation and doing what one thinks is right is noble and admirable even if ones conscience is a broken thermometer. However, one might doubt that being disposed to delineate ones conscience is unambiguously good when ones conscience is seriously in error. For one thing, moral flaws such(prenominal) as a lazy indisposition to hard thinking and an sycophantic deference toward established power and authority might play a large role in fixing the content of ones judgments of conscience.A conceited lack of healthy skepticism just ab let on ones cognitive powers might be a determinant of ones strong disposition to do whatever one thinks to be right. Even if Kant is correct that the good will, the will order unfailingly at what is truly right, has an absolute and unconditional worth, it is doubtful that the ambitious good will, a will directed toward what it takes to be right on whatever flimsy or solid grounds charm to it, has such worth. Take an extreme case Suppose a special person has a would-be good will that is unceasingly in error.This could be strong or righteous, so that the agent always does what he thinks is right, or weak and corrupt, so that the agent never does what she thinks is right. If the will is always in error, the odds of doing the right thing are increase if the would-be good will is weak and corrupt. Some might value more highly on consequential grounds the weak and corrupt erroneous will, even though the strong and righteous invariably erroneous will always shines like a treasure in its own right.And some might hold that quite aside from the expected consequences, playacting on a seriously erroneous judgment of right is inherently of lesser worth than acting on correct judgment of right. Even if the disposition to do what one thinks morally right is unassailable, its purported value does not provide a sound basis for asserting the equal worth and dignity of human persons. The capacity to act cons cientiously itself varies experimentally across persons like any other valued capacity.A accessible genetic endowment and favorable early socialization experiences bestow more of this capacity on some persons and less on others. If we think of an agents will as disposed more or less strongly to do what she conscientiously believes to be right, different individuals with the akin disposition will experience good and evil luck in facing temptations that exceed their resolve. Even if we assume that agents always have freedom of the will, it will be difficult to different degrees for different persons to exercise their free will as conscience dictates.Moreover, individuals will vary in their psychological capacities to dispose their will to do what conscience dictates. One might retreat further to the claim that all persons equally can try to dispose their will to do what is right, even if they will succeed in this enterprise to different degrees. But the ability to try is also a ps ychological capacity that we should expect would vary empirically across persons. At times Kant seems to appeal to epistemic grounds in reasoning from the goodness of the good will to the equal worth and dignity of all human persons.We dont know what anyones inner motivations are, even our own, so the judgment that anyone is firmly disposed to do what is right can never be confirmed. But sure the main issue is whether humans are so ordered that we ought to accord them fundamental equal moral status, not whether, given our beliefs, it is reasonable for us to act as if they are so ordered. The idea that there is a door of rational agency capacity such that any being with a capacity supra the threshold is a person equal in fundamental moral status to all other persons prompts a worry ab aside how to identify this threshold non arbitrarily.It might seem that and the variance mingled with nil capacity and some capacity would preclude the skeptical doubt that the line set at any posi tive level of capacity could just as well have been set higher or lower. Regarding the proposal to identify any above-zero capacity as qualifying one for personhood, we believe a being with barely a glimmer of capacity to perceive the good and the right and to dispose its will toward their attainment. The difference among none and some might be infinitesimal, after all.However, a threshold need not be razor-thin. Perhaps there is a line below which beings with rational capacities in this range are definitely not persons and a higher level such that all beings with capacities above this level are definitely persons. Beings with rational capacities that fall in the middle range or colour in area between these levels are near-persons. The levels can be set sufficiently far apart that the difference between scoring at the lower and the higher levels is undeniably of moral significance.But the difference between the rational capacities of the beings just above the higher line, call th em marginal persons, and the beings at the upper end of the racing shell who have saintly genius capacities, is not thereby shown to be insignificant. At the lower end we might depend persons like the villains depicted in the Dirty Harry Clint Eastwood movies. These unfortunates are not shown as having moral capacities which they are flouting, but or else as bad by reputation, and perhaps not entitled to full human rights.No doubt this is a crass outlook, but the question remains whether the compendium we can offer of the basis for human equality generates a refutation of it. Suppose someone asserts that the difference between the rational agency capacities of the most perceptive saints and the most unreflective and animalistic villains defines a difference in fundamental moral status that is just as important for morality as the difference between the rational agency capacities of near-persons and marginal persons. What mistake does this claim embody?COMMENTS ON KANTS ETHICAL THEORY Because we so commonly take it for granted that moral values are intimately connected with the goal of human well-being or happiness, Kants insistence that these two concepts are abruptly independent makes it difficult to grasp his point of view and easy to misunderstand it. The following comments are intended to help the you to annul the most common misunderstandings and appreciate the sort of outlook that characterizes what Kant takes to be the heart of the ethical life.Kants ethical theory is often cited as the paradigm of a deontological theory. Although the theory certainly can be seriously criticized, it remains probably the finest analysis of the bases of the concepts of moral normal and moral duty. Kants endeavor to ground moral duty in the nature of the human being as essentially a rational being marks him as the last slap-up Enlightenment thinker.In spite of the fact that his critical philosophy in epistemology and metaphysics brought an end to The Age of origi n, in ethics his attempt to derive the form of any ethical duty from the very nature of a rational being is the philosophical high water mark of the Enlightenments vision of humanity as essentially and uniquely rational.What Kant aims to provide is a metaphysics of morals in the sense of an analysis of the grounds of moral contract in the nature of a rational being. In other words, Kant aims to descend his ethical theory stringently by a priori reasoning from the concept of what it is to be a human person as a rational agent.The fact that people have the faculty of being able to use reason to decide how to act expresses the fundamental metaphysical doctrine -the basis or foundation in the nature of reality- on which Kants ethical theory is erected. Kant begins his treatise, The Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals with the famous dramatic sentence Nothing can peradventure be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good without qualification , except a good will. 1. What does Kant mean by good without qualification?Obviously people try to stress and avoid umteen different sorts of things those things which they seek they call good, while those they try to avoid, they call bad. These goods which people seek may be divided into those which are sought-after(a) as means to some further end and those which they seek as good as ends in themselves. Obviously some things may be good as means to one end and bad as means to some other end. Different persons, do by different ends, will thus find different things good and bad ( congress to their different ends).More food is good to a starving man, but it is bad to one overweight. In order for something to be good without qualification it must not be merely good as means to one end but bad as means to some other end. It must be sought as good totally independently of serving as a means to something else it must be good in-itself. Furthermore, while one thing may be good as mean s sex act to a finical end, that end becomes a means relative to some other end. So a college diploma may be sought as good as a means for the end of a higher-paying job.And a higher-paying job may be good as a means to increased financial security and increased financial security may be good as a means to obtaining the necessities of life as well as a few of its luxuries. However, if we seek A only for the sake of B, and B only for the sake of C, and so forth , then there is never a confession for seeking A at the beginning of such a series unless there is something at the end of that series which we seek as a good in-itself not merely as means to some further end.Such an ultimate end would then be an absolute rather than a relative good. Kant means that a good will is good without qualification as such an absolute good in-itself, universally good in every instance and never merely as good to some yet further end. 2. why is a good will the only thing which is universally absolut ely good? Kants point is that to be universally and absolutely good, something must be good in every instance of its occurrence.He argues that all those things which people call good (including intelligence, wit, judgment, courage, resolution, perseverance, power, riches, honor, health, and even happiness itself) can become extremely bad and mischievous if the will which is to make use of them is not good. In other words, if we surmise a bad person (i. e. one who willed or wanted to do evil), who had all of these so-called goods (intelligence, wit, and so forth ), these very traits would make only that much worse his will to do what is wrong.(We would get the criminal master-mind of the ludicrous books. ) Even health often also cited as a good in- itself may serve to make a person insensitive and indifferent to the lack of good health in others. 3. Isnt happiness such a universal, absolute good in-itself? Kant answers clearly, No. However, many philosophers (the ones we call eud aemonists) have assumed the obvious answer to be Yes. entirely ancient eudaemonistic ethical theories as well as modern utilitarian theories closely define happiness as the absolute end of all ethical behavior.Such eudaemonistic ethical theories are attractive because of the fact that they make it easy to answer the question Why should I do what is morally right? For any eudaemonistic theory the answer will always be Because the morally right action is always ultimately in the interest of your own happiness. Since these theories generally assume that people really are do by a hope for their own happiness, their only problem is to show that the morally right action really does serve as the best means to obtain the end of happiness.Once you are led to see this, so such theories assume, the question Why should I do what is morally right? is automatically answered. Kant totally rejects this eudaemonistic way of ethical theorizing he calls decisions made according to such a comp uter science of what produces your own happiness prudential decisions and he distinguishes them sharply from ethical decisions. This is not because Kant thinks we are not motivated by a desire for happiness, in fact like the ancient philosophers, he takes it for granted that we are however, such motivation cannot be that which makes an action ethically right or wrong.The fact that an action might chasten to happiness cannot be the grounds of moral obligation. Kant regards the notion of happiness as both too indefinite and too empirical to serve as the grounds for moral obligation why we ought to do something. In the first place it is too indefinite because all people have very different sorts of talents, tastes and enjoyments which mean in effect that one persons happiness may be another persons misery. This is because the concept is empirical in the sense that the only way you can know whether what you seek will actually serve to bring you happiness is by experience.As Kant point s out, it is impossible that the most clear-sighted man should frame to himself a definite conception of what he really wills in this. Since we cannot know a priori onwards an action whether it really will be conducive to our happiness (because the notion is so indefinite that even the most clear-sighted amongst us cannot know everything that must form part of his own happiness) the desire for our own happiness cannot serve as a motive to determine our will to do this or that action. Moreover, Kant observes that even the general well-being and happiness with ones condition that is called happiness, can inspire pride, and often presumption, if there is not a good will to correct the influence of these on the mind. In other words happiness cannot be good without qualification for if we imagine it occurring in a person totally devoid of the desire to do what is right, it could very well lead to all sorts of immoral actions. 4. What does Kant mean by a good will? To act out of a goo d will for Kant means to act out of a sense of moral obligation or duty.In other words, the moral agent does a ill-tempered action not because of what it produces (its consequences) in foothold of human experience, but because he or she recognizes by reasoning that it is morally the right thing to do and thus regards him or herself as having a moral duty or obligation to do that action. One may of course as an added fact get some pleasure or other gain from doing the right thing, but to act morally, one does not do it for the sake of its desirable consequences, but rather because one understands that it is morally the right thing to do.In this respect Kants view towards morality parallels the Christians view concerning bow to Gods commandments, according to which the Christian obeys Gods commandments simply because God commands them, not for the sake of rewards in heaven after dying or from fear of punishment in hell. In a similar way, for Kant the rational being does what is mo rally right because he recognizes himself as having a moral duty to do so rather than for anything he or she may get out of it. 5. When does one act from a motive of doing ones duty?Kant answers that we do our moral duty when our motive is determined by a principle recognized by reason rather than the desire for any expected consequence or emotional feeling which may cause us to act the way we do. The will is defined as that which provides the motives for our actions. Obviously many times we are motivated by specific desires or emotions. I may act the way I do from a feeling of friendship for a particular individual, or from desire for a particular consequence. I may also be motivated by particular emotions of fear, or envy, or pity, etc.When I act in these ways, I am motivated by a desire for a particular end in Kants vocabulary I am said to act out of inclination. Insofar as an action is motivated by inclination, the motive to do it is contingent upon the desire for the particula r end which the action is imagined to produce. Thus as different rational agents might have different inclinations, there is no one motive from inclination common to all rational beings. Kant distinguishes acts motivated by inclination from those through on principle.For example someone may ask why I did a certain thing, and point out that it brought me no gain, or perhaps even made life a bit less winning to which I might reply, I know I do not stand to gain by this action, but I do it because of the principle of the thing. For Kant, this sort of state of mind is the essence of the moral consciousness. When I act on principle the sole factor determining my motive is that this particular action exemplifies a particular case falling under a general law or maxim. For Kant the mental butt by which the actor understands that a particular case falls under a certain principle is an exercise in reasoning, or to be more precise, what Kant called practical reason, reason used as a guide t o action. (Pure Reason is reason used to attain certainty, or what Kant called scientific knowledge. ) Since to have moral worth an action must be done on principle, and to see that a certain principle applies to a particular action requires the exercise of reason, only rational beings can be said to behave morally. 6. Why does Kant believe that to have moral worth an action must be done on principle rather than inclination?Kants argument here may seem strange to the contemporary outlook, for it assumes that everything in nature is designed to serve a purpose. Now it is an obvious fact that human beings do have a faculty of practical reason, reason applied to the guidance of actions. (Kant is of course fully aware the people often fail to employ this faculty i. e. they act non-rationally (without reason) or even absurdly (against what reason dictates) but he intends that his ethical theory is normative, prescribing how people ought to behave, rather than descriptive of how they act ually do behave.)If everything in nature serves some purpose then the faculty of practical reason must have some purpose. Kant argues that this purpose cannot be merely the attainment of some specific desired end, or even the attainment of happiness in general, for if it were, it would have been far better for nature simply to have endowed persons with an instinct to achieve this end, as is the case with the non- rational animals. Therefore, the fact that human beings have a faculty of practical reason cannot be explained by claiming that it allows them to attain some particular end.So the fact that reason can guide our actions, but cannot do so for the sake of achieving some desired end, leads Kant to the conclusion that the function of practical reason must be to allow humans as rational beings to apply general principles to particular instances of action, or in other words to engage in moral reasoning as a way of determining ones moral obligation what is the right action to do. T hus we act morally only when we act rationally to apply a moral principle to determine the motive of our action. 7. Do all persons have the same moral duties? According to Kant only rational beings can be said to act morally.Reason for Kant (as for all the Enlightenment thinkers) is the same for all persons in other words there isnt a poor mans reason versus a rich mans reason or a white mans reason versus a black mans reason. All persons are equal as potentially rational beings. Therefore, if reason dictates that one person, in a particular situation, has a moral duty to do a particular thing, then any person, in that same situation, would equally well have a duty to do that same thing. In this sense Kants reasoning parallels the way in which stoicism led Roman lawyers to the conclusion that all citizens are equal before the law.Thus Kant is a moral absolutist in the sense that all persons have the same moral duties, for all persons are equal as rational beings. But this absolutism does not mean that Kant holds that our moral duties are not relative to the situation in which we find ourselves. Thus it is quite possible for Kant to conclude that in one particular situation I may have a duty to slide by my promise, but in another situation (in which, for example, keeping a promise conflicts with a higher duty) I may equally well be morally obligated to break a promise. 8.Why is it that actions done for the sake of some end cannot have moral worth? Since what ones moral duties are in a particular situation are the same for all persons, ones moral duties must be independent of the particular likes and dislikes of the moral agent. Now any action which is motivated by the desire for some particular end presupposes that the agent has the desire for that end. However, from the simple concept of a rational being it is not possible to deduce that any particular rational being would have any particular desired ends.Most people, of course, desire to seek pleasure and av oid pain, but there is no logical contradiction involved in the notion of a rational being who does not desire pleasure or perhaps who desires pain. Thus reason does not dictate that any particular rational being has any particular end. But if the desire for a particular end gave an action its moral worth, then only those rational beings who happened in fact to desire that end would regard such actions as good, while those that desired to avoid such an end, would regard the action as bad. (Thus for example eudaemonistic theories which assume the end of achieving happiness is what gives an action its moral value, would serve to induce only those beings who happened to have the desire for happiness to behave morally. For those rational beings who happened to desire to avoid happiness, there would be no incentive to behave morally and what appears good to the happiness-seeker will appear positively bad to one who seeks to avoid happiness. ) But, as we have seen above, Kants absolutism reaches the conclusion that moral obligation is the same for all persons.Thus the ground of moral obligation, what makes an action a moral duty, cannot lie in the end which that act produces. 9. What does reason tell us about the principle that determines the morally dutiful motive? Since Kant has ruled out the ends (i. e. the consequences) which an act produces as well as any motive but those determined by the application of principle as determining moral duty, he is faced now with the task of deriving the fundamental principles of his ethical theory solely from the concept of what it is to be a rational being.He now argues (in a very obscure manner) that from this notion of what is demanded by being rational, he can deduce that it would be irrational to act on any principle which would not apply equally to any other actor in the same situation. In other words, Kant claims that reason dictates that the act we are morally obligated to do is one which is motivated by adherence to a p rinciple which could, without inconsistency, be held to apply to any (and all) rational agents.This fundamental ethical principle, which is commonly called The Categorical Imperative, Kant summarizes with the statement that I am never to act otherwise than so that I could also will that my maxim become a universal law. Kants claim that Reason demands the moral agent to act on a universal law thus in many ways parallels Jesus dictum that God commands that those who love Him obey The Golden Rule. 10. What is a categorical imperative? Any statement of moral obligation which I make the principle of my action (my maxim in Kants vocabulary), in the context of a specific situation, constitutes an imperative. I might, in such a situation, choose to act on a statement of the form, If I desire some specific end (e. g. happiness, maximum pleasure, power, etc. ), then I ought to do such and such an action. In doing so I would be acting on what Kant calls a hypothetical imperative. However, Kant has already ruled out ends as the grounds for moral obligation thus hypothetical imperatives cannot serve as the basis for determining my moral duty. However, if I act on a principle which has the form, In circumstances of such and such a character, I ought to.

Anthem and Farenheit 451 Essay Example for Free

Anthem and Fargonnheit 451 evidenceFahrenheit 451 and Anthem Comparison Essay When a person is entrapped deep down a company that dictates their behaviour, thoughts, and opinions they are unable to grasp the realization of their societies deprave nature. How ever, at that place is always the odd individual who willing and competent of uncovering the truth of their lodge. In the raws Anthem by Ayn Rand, and Fahrenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury the chief(prenominal) characters of the smarts were able to pass off truth by, forming friendships that are banned by their societies, rebelling against the grain of fellowship to gain intimacy or form sentiments, and arriveing flaws within their societies. Thus proving that, when champion and only(a) seeks truth within the barrier of a supreme edict it considers to egotism-discovery because they find the fortitude to break away. When one seeks truth within the confines of a controlling beau monde by forming frien dships that are banned it leads to self-discovery, because they find the courage to escape. For instance, Montag a character form the romance Fahrenheit 451. In the indian lodge that he lived in, any types of practice session existent was considered forbidden.Those who took it upon themselves to embrace the reading solid were considered to be just as harmful as the material itself, because it lead mint to believe both the false promises, whole the second-hand nonions and time worn philosophies that people had (Bradbury, 76). However, Montag intentially befriended an elderly man named Faber, who in his younger days, sooner the revolution, was an English professor. Montag know that Faber was experienceable in writings, still he became his friend regardless of this fact because he was unmatched of the forbidden treasures that his companionship kept from him.On the other hand Faber was aware of the glorious preachings, concepts, and ideas that literature held, and he was a lso aware of the error his society was qualification when it decided to eliminate reading material during its transformation. Although he was conscious of the valuable information that would be lost Faber did not speak out or fight against this decision, in turn he lost one of the most valuable things in his livelihood Im one of the innocents who could consecrate spoken up and out when no would listen to the guilty, but I did not speak and thus became guilty myself Now its too late (Bradbury, 82).Fabers misfortune friendship and his non-existent initiative to fight for literature inspired Montag to discover his aline self, and his own beliefs that lead him to flee form his society in order to end up regretting the fact that he did not protest for his right to knowledge. Thus showing that by Montag forming a friendship that was not excepted by his society he found the courage to escape. A second voice of one finding enough courage to escape a controlling society, because of a ba nned friendship is checkity 7-2521 of the novel Anthem.In the society in which compare 7-2521 lives feelings and emotions that one may withdraw towards another are forbidden, because it makes that individual different and unique(p) from others within a society where everyone is to be considered equal. Although this is a main law Equality finds himself demesne emaciated to a young girl by the name of improperness 7-2000. With his new found attraction Equality 7-2521 reaches out to the girl in hopes of grasping a relationship, and this is exactly what he achieves.The relationship between Equaulity 7-2521 and Liberty 7-2000 helped him discover his true self. It made him realize that he was able to defend love for someone else and that there was nothing wrong or improper about the feelings that he was experiencing and that this was not curse but an advantage, one that have him an individual. Equalitys self discovery, gave him the gallantry to escape form his society, because i t made him recognize how corrupt and controlling his society was and it also made him realize that the only way he would ever genuinely be happy is if he were free.Both characters with in the novels Anthem, and Fahrenheit 451 notice themselves by forming friendships that were not excepted in their society, an din both cases they gained enough courage to escape. Montags friendship with Faber inspired Montag to escape and realize his true self only because he was afraid to set out what Faber was a coward, not willing to fight for his beliefs. In contrast, the friendship that Equality 7-2521 and Liberty 7-2000 shared inspired Equality to discover his self, and escape, because he was different and enjoyed organism unique from the rest of his society.This shows that although both characters were inspired by friendships, the reasons for their actions, and their self-discovery were different. Thus proving that, when one seeks truth within the confines of a controlling society it leads t o self-discovery, because they find the courage to escape. A second factor that must be accounted for is the fact that when one seeks truth within the confines of a controlling by rebelling against the grain of society to form ideas or gain knowledge it leads to self revelation and it gives them the courage to escape. A good example of this is Equality 7-2521.In the novel Anthem Equality seeks and finds truth in his society by discovering a source of energy. The process of Equalitys discovery was very long and strenuous and it consisted of disobeying the rules that were set, on many an(prenominal) given nights in order to sneak away and work in his secretive tunnel on his invention. Because of what his society preached, he instilled in his thoughts that he was, born with a curse (Rand, 13). Equality 7-2521 believed this because he was curious about the nature of things and broke rules to explore the world in which he lived.However, when he discovered that he was able to produce a l ight from a source other than a candle his thoughts and opinions towards himself and his society changed. His society did not deficiency to recognize or accept the new energy that he discovered. The societys ignorant towards Equality 7-2521s discovery, that could have changed the way that the society lived and worked angered him. In turn out it made him discover that he was a unique individual that had thoughts that were far more indepth and surpassed the thoughts of others he was encircled by.Equality 7-2521s search to gain knowledge helped him build the strength to escape the controlling society that he lived in because he realized that it and the individuals that it contained were just holding him back form discovering his true self and environment further. Equality 7-2521 sought truth within his society by rebelling against it and forming a new idea and that gave him the strength to escape. In addition, Montag from the novel Fahrenheit 451 was also in search of truth and did s o by rebelling against his society and gaining knowledge that resulted in courage to brake free.In the society of this novel people were keep back form reading literature, and to ensure that this law was not broken. It was the job of firefighters to burn and destroy all reading materials. Montag was a perfect example of a firefighter he ignighted books to ensure that the evil teachings that they held would never by absorbed by people of his society, until his curiosity overtook him there must be something in books, things we cant imagine, there must be something there (Bradbury, 51). This interest Montag had in hat his society withheld from its people soon overwhelmed him and he found himself rebelling by secretly recovering and protecting book form homes that were being destroyed because of the literature that they contained Montag felt the hidden book pound like a heart against his pectus (Bradbury, 39). Not only did Montag rebel by stealing books, but he embraced the knowledge inside. The wisdom that he acquired from these sources of knowledge lead him to self-discovery, because he realized the corrupt nature of his society.His society was so corrupt that he no longer wanted to take part and inhibit people form opening and expanding their minds. Montags self discovery is evident when suddenly the odor of kerosene made him vomit, although it was once such a great smell that only a true firefighter could love, and he could no longer do his job as a firefighter and be happy (Bradbury, 49). Montags new found knowledge gave him the courage to escape because he recognized that if he stayed and continued to be controlled by his society that he would never be able to spread the knowledge and wisdom that he had gained.Both Equality 7-2521 and Montag rebelled within their societys and in result formed ideas or captured some form of wisdom. Furthermore, both discovered themselves and recognized from their discovery that they needed to break free form their society in order to have freedom and the will to share their advanced knowledge and ideas. Montag and Equality 7-2521 both made discoveries that could have and would have changed the way their societys functioned and thought.Although, what Montag realized had been recognized by individuals in his society before in contrast to Equalitys newly discovered light source that was unknown to his society. Therefore proving that when one seeks truth within the confines of a controlling society, it leads to self-discovery, because it gives them the courage to escape. The last factor that must be accounted for is the fact that when one presues truth within the confines of a manipulating society by finding flaws within, it leads to self-discovery, because they find the courage to escape.An example of this is Equality 7-2521. The society that he lived in is very narrow minded and believes that concord is essential in order for all to be content. Their Motto We are one in all and all in one. There are no men but only the great WE, one, indivisible by(predicate) and forever, is the basis of their ethics, and suppresses them form leading a typical lifestyle. No one within the society of the novel Anthem was permitted to have thoughts, pinions, or ideas of their own. Equality 7-2521 was silenced by the conformity that his society had.Finally he came to the realization that his societys flaw was depriving him and others of their individuality. This realization gave Equality 7-2521 a better understanding of himself. Him recognizing his societys flaw gave him the bravery to escape, because he realized that his society would never learn from it mistakes and frailties, and that he needed to take action in order to get out a better and more fulfilling life for himself and others. Therefore, Equality 7-2521 investigation for truth within his society led him to the realization of flaws that it contained, and gave him the courage to escape.In comparison, in the novel Fahrenheit 451 Montag uncovers imperfections within his society, that directed him to discover himself, because it gave him the courage to retreat. The society that Montag lives in confines the population by restraining them from any sort of reading material, in fear that the material will cause people to become unhappy, depressed, or angry, with the information that it consists of We stand against the small tide of those who want to make everyone unhappy with conflicting supposition and thought Dont let the torrent of melancholy and drear philosophy drown our world (Bradbury, 62).This quotation proves that this society believes that it is truly making people happy by holding back, and not allowing them to have opinions and thoughts of their own, basically controlling them. Not only does the society of the novel control people by making it known that they can not enjoy the pleasure, and benefits of reading, but they also control them with parlor walls, which are devil televisions that take up an entire living room wall. These walls tell you what to think and blasts it in. It must be right.It seems so right. It rushes you on so quickly to its own conclusions your mind hasnt time to protest (Bradbury, 84). Montag realizes that this is his societys major fault, and the reason that they are in desperate attempts of controlling everyone is because they believe and want everyone to be besides We must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitutions says, but everyone made equal (Bradbury, 58).Montags recognition of his societys flaw leads him to self-discovery ecause he realizes exactly what his society is doing, and knows that it is not mentally healthy for any individual. Montag breaks free of his society by escaping, because he yearns for the knowledge and independency that his society refuses to provide and except. Both characters apprehend that their societys have major obstacles that they have to overcome before it could ever become a well functioning and pro ductive society with well functioning individuals. They also escape the societies, because they realize that nothing will ever be done about the blunders that they hold.Furthermore, both Montag, and Equality 7-2521 debate when free from their past societies that they want to take action, and establish a society of their own. Both societies in the deuce novels Fahrenheit 451 and Anthem find ways of controlling the humanity that it with hold by molding them into what them want them to be. Thus and thus proving that when one seeks truth within the confines of a controlling society it leads to self-discovery, because they find the courage to escape.

Outline and essay of Thomas Jefferson Essay Example for Free

Outline and essay of Thomas Jefferson auditionThomas JeffersonI. Thomas Jefferson (1743-1836)II. A. Education- Was move to Dover, Virginia, where he studied Latin with Reverend William Douglas until 1757. He was then sent to the school of the Reverend James Maury at Hanover, Virginia, and spent two years studying Greek and Latin classics, history, literature, geography, and natural science. In March 1760 Jefferson entered the College of William and Mary. B. Occupational Background- 1767- Jefferson admitted to the practice of law and became a successful lawyer. Also supervise the Shadwell Plantation. Was a member of the Virginia House of Burgesses. Took an active part in take downts that lead to the American Revolution. 1776- Jefferson took his seat in recounting as an elected delegate and wrote the Declaration of Independence. Served as depositary of State at a lower place working capital and Vice chair under Madison.III. Served two terms (1800-1808)IV. Key issues promi nent in Election- federal politics vs. states rights, westward expansion of the terra firma, Native Americans, the freedom of lower class white men.V. OpponentsA. First Election (1800)- Aaron burr (Democratic-Republican), John Adams (Federalist), Charles C. Pinckney (Federalist), John Jay (Federalist)B. Second Election (1804)- Charles C. Pinckney (Federalist)VI. Vice PresidentA. 1st term vice- Aaron withdrawB. second term vice- George ClintonVII. Political Party of Jefferson- Democratic-RepublicanVIII. Domestic HappeningsA. Louisiana Purchase (1803)- The Louisiana Territory was leveragingd for 15 one million million million dollars from France. Doubled the size of U.S. secured navigation rights on the manuscript River. Authorized purchase without making amendment, exercised the presidents implied powers to treasure the nation.B. twelfth Amendment (1804)- Citizens are to vote for President and Vice President separately. Prevented coming(prenominal) electoral crises.C. Non-Imp ortation travel (1807)- prohibited consequence from Great Britain of cloth and metal articles.D. Embargo Act (1807)- Stopped mailments of food and other American products to conflicting ports. Many were thrown out of work because of it. Was created to wield U.S. neutrality. Created as a short-term measure to go along confrontation between American merchant vessels and British and French warships and to put pressure on France and England.E. Non- colloquy Act (1809)- passed by Jefferson in his last days of office. Reopened trade with all nations except Britain and France, and authorized the president to resume trade with Britain or France if either of them ceased to violate neutral rights.IX. Foreign Policy Decisions- Stated under domestic happenings.X. Major Conflict of Administration-A. Tripoli war (1801-05)- A conflict between the United States and Tripoli, incited by American refusal to continue payment of tribute to the piratical rulers of the North African Barbary States of Algiers, capital of Tunisia, Morocco, and Tripoli. Involved North Africa, was generation of fight about protection frompirates in Barbary States.B. Marbury v. Madison (1803)- Supreme court of the United States effected its sanction to review and invalidate government actions that conflict with the Constitution of the United States. First time that the Supreme Court declared an act of Congress to be unconstitutional. Established Judicial Review.C. Burr Hamilton Duel (1804)- Hamilton publicly criticized Burr, Burr demanded for an apology and a duel resulted. Hamilton was fatally wounded.D. Republicans attack the federalist judiciary (1804)- Republicans were making every effort to obliterate federalist judges from power. The house was unable to impeach Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase. Preserved the Courts independence and established the precedent that criminal actions were the only grounds for impeachment.E. The Chesapeake Incident (1807)- British ship fired upon American ship that refused to be searched for deserters. Three Americans were killed, and eighteen wounded British seized four deserters, three were American citizens. Exposed American military weakness and increased the impact of impressments on the public. Would be the cause of Embargo Act.XI. Major accessible Changes-A. Peoples involvement in Politics increased. 90 percent of eligible voters cast ballots between 1804 and 1816. Political barbeques states, and pertly style of campaigning evolved.B. Slave revolutionist ideas began.C. American Art began to take shape.1. Rembrandt Peale was one of most famous of first American artists. Was famous for his portraits of American presidents.XII. Major Inventions and Technological AdvancementsA. Robert Fultons invention the Steamboat, Clermont(1807) hires its debutXIII.Thomas Jefferson was a fairly good president and receives an overall rating of 6.5. His decisions and ideas were sometimes wise and sometimes foolish.Jeffersons main goals were t o fix government to its limited role, to extend the Republicans power in the federal government, to establish republican virtues such as independence, self-reliance, and equality, and to reduce the content debt as untold as possible. He as well as wanted to expand the nation and make it as powerful as possible. Like the presidents before him, he also wanted to maintain neutrality, undisturbed commerce, and no entangling alliances. Adams accomplished some of these goals. Initially, the national debt was decreased. Congress repealed all internal taxes, including the Whiskey Tax. Jefferson also declined to use the Alien and Sedition Acts against his opponents, and congress allowed both acts to expire. The Naturalization Act was also replaced with a much less severe one.He refused to recognize any of the appointments Adams made in the last days of his presidency, and awarded unemployed treasury and judicial offices to republicans. He succeeded in his goal and got rid of the old Fed eralist programs he didnt like. As for expansion, the purchase of the Louisiana Territory allowed Jefferson to achieve exactly what he had dreamed of. It also prevented war with France, over the Mississippi River. Accomplishing this goal however, contradicted his goal of eliminating the National debt and strictly abiding by the Constitution.Jeffersons cabinet included Aaron Burr (1801) and George Clinton (1805-1809) as Vice president, James Madison as Secretary of State (1801-1809), Secretary of the Treasury Samuel Dexter (1801) and Albert Gallatin (1801-1809), Secretary of War Henry Dearborn (1801-1809), and Secretary of Navy Robert Smith(1801-1809). Albert Gallatin was one of Jeffersons bestappointments. Gallatin worked to help achieve Jeffersons goals in National budget. He cut the army budget in half and reduced the 1802 Navy budget by two-thirds. Gallatin moved to reduce the national debt from 83 million to 57 million. Robert Smith also had a no juvenileorthy influence. He ov ersaw the Navy that blockaded Tripoli to win the Tripoli war and also forced the Algiers and Tunis to renounce attacks against Americans. The president chose his cabinet because he believed they were the most qualified and wanted to achieve the same things he did. This was true for the most part, and his cabinet was on his side.The president and congress got along very well. The Republicans were in volume throughout his presidency so Jefferson had no problems with congress. When Jefferson declined using the Alien and Sedition Acts congress let them expire. Congress repealed the Naturalization Act, and created a new one that required less for citizenship. Congress also repealed the Judiciary Act of 1801, so Jefferson could appoint a Supreme Court member. Jefferson controlled congress through his leadership of the Republican Party. It was securely on Jeffersons side and did everything it could to further the republican interest.Jefferson had to get across with domestic and foreign crises. The nations had built up a large debt, which could be called a crisis. Jefferson wanted to reduce the debt as much as possible. At first, he did do this by cutting funding. But with the purchase of the Louisiana Territory the debt only increased. In the seas, Jefferson was approach with a number of problems. Britain was practicing impressments. Senate passed the non-importation act but he suspended it in hopes of a negotiation jogment. Negotiations were unrewarded so nonhing changed. At the time the impressments of sailors wasnt considered a crisis, but the Chesapeake affair made everyone aware. In reaction, Jefferson did not declare war, because he knew Britain had a superior Navy. Instead, he closed American waters to the British, and issued the Non-importation and Embargo Act. War may make up been avoided, but by closing all American ports Jefferson created his own new crises. export resulted and the American economy plummeted.By payoff the Embargo Act, he hurt his own nation more(prenominal) then his intended targets, Great Britain andFrance. Resentment was also created throughout New England, and talk of succession started. To deal with this crisis he created, Jefferson issued the Non-Intercourse Act. The new Act solved the problems created by the embargo, but didnt prevent any of the same problems that prompted it. The issuing of these acts was by far the presidents greatest failure. Although it was a failure, some good did come out of it. Americas industries grew. Forbidden to trade, Americans had to make their own products. The Embargo precipitated the Industrial Revolution. For Jefferson, the crises he dealt with are ones hed rather forget.A minor crisis which Jefferson had to deal with was Aaron Burrs conspiracy, the details of which are still un cognise, either to establish an independent republic in the Louisiana Territory or to launch an invasion of Spanish-held Mexico. Jefferson acted swiftly to arrest Burr early in 1807 and brou ght him to trial for treason. Jefferson is not known as a good president for how he dealt with crises, it is the opposite. As for his accomplishments, the Louisiana Purchase was his greatest success. The land was vast and benefited the nation in many ways. Not only was war avoided, but a aggregative amount of land was acquired. Navigation on the Mississippi River was also gained, which was extremely important for trade. This accomplishment was possibly one of the greatest of any president and administration in American History.Thomas Jefferson was greatly prise by the people of his day. He was well known as a revolutionary leader and as the author of the Declaration of Independence. He was also known and respected as the governor of Virginia. He authentically served the people, and was the first president to lead a political party. Jefferson was a leader, and everyone who knew of him saw him as one.Jefferson was frugal, simple, and fickle. From the beginning, Jefferson made it terminate that he wanted to represent the average American, unlike the other presidents before him, he dressed plainly, even at his inauguration. He was frugal in that he cut spending as much as possible, internal taxes were reduced and the military budget was cut, with the exception of the Louisiana Purchase. He was fickle in that he did not hesitate in buying the Louisiana Territory, using Federal power. Jefferson was known to believe in strict interpretation of the Constitution and it did not state that the presidenthad the authority to acquire new territory and integrate it into the nation.The president and his administration influenced decisions made by future administrations. Jeffersons decision to exercise the implied powers the president has to protect the nation set a precedent for future presidents. Many things Jefferson and his administration did also affected the lives of future generations. The purchase of the Louisiana territory would create a whole new group of peop le, called frontiersman. People would settle into the area and live new lives. Purchasing the territory, although causing further debt, was the best thing for the country. It would end up being an excellent investment. Jeffersons embargo act, also had a dramatic affect on the future.He did not know at the time, but the embargo Act would enhance Americas industries, and start a whole new trend. When the president made his decisions they were thought through, although not always good ones. The decisions Jefferson made in foreign personal business were mostly correct, because the nation was not ready for war and to stay neutral was the best thing. But Jefferson should have avoided war by using methods other than economic pressure. Jefferson was fairly-open minded and would listen to others. Its hard to say on the button how open-minded he was, because his cabinet and congress agreed with him on just about everything.Overall, Thomas Jefferson was a good president. Although his results were far from perfect at times, his intentions were good.